Make Toil Reduction Part of Capacity Planning

-

Most engineering organizations say they want to reduce toil. Far fewer reserve capacity to do it.

That gap matters. Repetitive operational work rarely disappears through good intentions. It competes with product delivery, security requirements, incidents, and customer commitments. Unless leaders account for toil during planning, teams will keep absorbing it as an unofficial tax.

Toil is a capacity problem

Manual access changes, recurring deployment fixes, repetitive incident recovery, and routine environment maintenance consume real engineering time. They also interrupt concentration and make delivery less predictable.

Leaders often treat this work as the cost of operating a system. Some of it is. The mistake is accepting the same cost indefinitely without deciding whether automation, simplification, or removal would be a better investment.

Do not ask teams to eliminate toil alongside a fully committed roadmap. Make the tradeoff visible. If reducing a recurring task requires two weeks of engineering effort, compare that investment with the ongoing capacity it consumes and the risk it creates.

Build a small, reviewable backlog

A giant automation backlog quickly becomes another neglected inventory. Start with a short list of recurring work that teams can describe clearly.

  • How often does the task occur?
  • Who must perform or approve it?
  • What happens when it is delayed or done incorrectly?
  • Can it be removed, standardized, delegated, or automated?

Prioritize work that is frequent, disruptive, error-prone, or dependent on scarce expertise. This keeps toil reduction connected to delivery and reliability rather than turning it into a vague efficiency program.

Hold leaders accountable for the tradeoff

Teams should identify toil, but leadership must decide how much capacity to invest in removing it. That decision should appear in quarterly and sprint planning, not remain hidden inside operational work.

Review whether completed improvements actually changed the workload. An automation that still requires constant manual intervention has not solved the problem. A runbook that makes a task safer may be useful, but it has reduced risk rather than eliminated toil. Name the outcome accurately.

The leadership takeaway is simple: recurring manual work is part of your engineering portfolio. Fund its reduction deliberately, measure the operational change, and stop expecting teams to improve the system only after they finish everything else.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manage IT by Johanna Rothman

-
I just completed this book. I think it is a really good book which covers a whole lot of software development. This book could possibly be the best book for first time project managers. I believe many of the PMs understand PMM but do not understand software development. This book gives a view of each project role. The only one that it does not cover is Business Analyst or requirements documentation. It does cover QC, development and of course PMs. It gives a PM a view into development processes like TDD, CI and estimation. Many PMs that are new to SD can read this book and get a great start to manager an SD project. If you are a PM or know some, read this book. http://www.jrothman.com/
Read more

How AI is Transforming DevSecOps: A New Era of Secure, Agile Software Delivery

-
 As software delivery accelerates and attack surfaces grow, traditional DevSecOps practices are being pushed to their limits. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into DevSecOps workflows is not just a trend—it’s a strategic imperative. AI is driving a seismic shift in how we manage code quality, automate security, respond to threats, and enable secure innovation at scale. In this post, we’ll explore the key ways AI is improving DevSecOps and why forward-thinking organizations are embedding it deeply into their pipelines. 1. Proactive Threat Detection and Response In modern CI/CD pipelines, code moves fast—sometimes too fast for human eyes to catch every vulnerability or misconfiguration. AI helps shift security left and right by: Analyzing code and dependencies with natural language processing and ML to detect hidden vulnerabilities, insecure APIs, or anomalous changes during commits. Real-time anomaly detection in production environments using AI-powered o...
Read more

Cloud Ops: The New IT for the Cloud Era

-
Over the past few months of interviewing and researching dozens of companies—particularly small to mid-sized SaaS businesses—one pattern keeps emerging: the desire to stand up a Cloud Operations (Cloud Ops) organization. It makes sense on the surface. Cloud is now the infrastructure of choice, so naturally, someone needs to “own” it. But what’s unfolding in practice often misses the mark. Many companies are attempting to solve growing cloud complexity by taking all their DevOps, SRE, and platform engineering talent and consolidating them into a Cloud Ops team. The idea? Share them across product teams so no one gets overwhelmed. If that sounds familiar, it should. It’s the same centralization tactic used by traditional IT for decades. And it's creating the same problems. When Cloud Ops Becomes Old IT in Disguise Here’s the playbook we’re seeing: Move DevOps, SRE, and Ops into a central Cloud Ops team. Let them handle infrastructure, CI/CD, monitoring, and cloud securit...
Read more