Skip to main content

When your company is squeezed, it shows your points of failure

When you go to the gym and workout, wait, when you work out at home, you goal is to push your body to point where it is uncomfortable or failure.  This produces change in your strength or overall fitness.  If you just do what is easy, your fitness doesn't improve.  

How does this apply to business?  

Do you deploy changes during month ends?  Holidays? Black Friday?
Do you push your teams to not be ok with even small failures?
Do you push teams to never have an outage?
Do you test your systems for failure?
Do you test your environment for security issues?
Do you challenge your people to think about the business or just their silo?
Do you accept statements like, "We just need to hire more people."

If you want to scale and grow your business, you have to squeeze your company to see what fails.  This is a way to make it stronger and ready for when your company takes off and has hyper growth.  The company culture has to be one of innovation and learning and scalability. 
 
  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2020 State of DevSecOps by Accurics

 This is an excellent report for all IT Pros and Engineers.   Highlights: Storage is most impacted solution Open security groups or network configuration Secrets are not so secret Unused resources are not secure. Take a look at these.  Look again.  These are not highly skilled problems.  They just need guidelines and proactive management.  The article uses policy as code as a solution for many of the problems.  I will drill into each of these more in the future.  I wanted to get the awareness out first and then, come back to solutions.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn Anti-Leadership from Basecamp

 There are many different articles out there and Twitter comments about the Basecamp drama.  I am not going to post any here because it might seem biased depending on the article.  Google them yourself.  In short, Basecamp made a policy to not allow political discussions at work.  Coinbase did this previously too and applauded Basecamp for it.   Apparently, for years there has been a list of funny customer names at floating around Basecamp.  This list or even the knowledge that Basecamp had a list, was disturbing to some employees.  Also, some employees tried to start a Diversity and Inclusion practice.  Despite how much the founders of Basecamp promoted DI, they didn't feel they were being taken serious.  They felt the company was only about the founders and not about employees.    If this isn't enough, the founders debated and even called out employees for their comments regarding the topics, publicly.  This is my s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cloud Ops: The New IT for the Cloud Era

Over the past few months of interviewing and researching dozens of companies—particularly small to mid-sized SaaS businesses—one pattern keeps emerging: the desire to stand up a Cloud Operations (Cloud Ops) organization. It makes sense on the surface. Cloud is now the infrastructure of choice, so naturally, someone needs to “own” it. But what’s unfolding in practice often misses the mark. Many companies are attempting to solve growing cloud complexity by taking all their DevOps, SRE, and platform engineering talent and consolidating them into a Cloud Ops team. The idea? Share them across product teams so no one gets overwhelmed. If that sounds familiar, it should. It’s the same centralization tactic used by traditional IT for decades. And it's creating the same problems. When Cloud Ops Becomes Old IT in Disguise Here’s the playbook we’re seeing: Move DevOps, SRE, and Ops into a central Cloud Ops team. Let them handle infrastructure, CI/CD, monitoring, and cloud securit...
Post a Comment
Read more